A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, assaulted his father on the front side of the 101-dong apartment unit D in Gwangju-si around 14:20 on October 25, 2015.

It shall be discarded from the Dong representative's Na, the president's death.

All persons shall be dead.

“The honor of the victim E who is the representative was damaged by openly stating the fact by speaking a large volume of apartment residents.”

2. On November 18, 2015, the Defendant displayed the Defendant’s father’s upper part of his father’s body while several representatives are heard at the resident representative conference held in Gwangju-si D apartment on November 18, 2015, and the Chairperson assaulted our father.

The Chairperson made a statement that he/she retired from office, thereby impairing the honor of the victim E by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Each investigation report (Submission of an application for attending a representative meeting of the suspect A, accompanied by the relevant pictures), each photograph, the application for attending a representative meeting of the occupants (F, G, H, and I specifically state the current situation as at the time of the instant case and the situation before and after the instant case, and there is no particular or unreasonable part in the contents of the statement.

In addition, in light of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, they make a false statement in order to identify the defendant.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, F, G, H, and I's statements are reliable.

The decision is judged.

In full view of these statements made by F, G, H, and I and the remaining evidence as seen earlier, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant made such statements as stated in the facts charged.

B. In light of the relevant legal principles, the Defendant’s act cannot be deemed as merely an expression of opinion whose content is a simple value judgment or evaluation, and the public interest is solely an expression of opinion.