The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is the representative of the E Apartment Residents' Representatives, and the victim F is the former representative of the E Apartment Residents' Representatives.

A. On February 18, 2016, at the meeting room of the above apartment management office located in G on February 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) referred the victim who died on December 29, 2015 in the presence of six representative members and the head of the management office on December 29, 2015; and (b) heard that the Defendant provided money to the victim from H I, a corporation that was awarded a contract for construction related to the re-building construction of the above apartment building that was around December 2014; or (c) did not confirm the fact that the former representative received money, despite the absence of the fact that the victim received money, the Defendant was drafted by 5% from I.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts with the purport of “.”

2. On March 18, 2016, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts with the same purport as Paragraph 1 at the same place as Paragraph 1, around 19:00, at the same time as that of Paragraph 1, and at the same time, five representatives and the head of the management office are present.

2. The following facts and circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the following facts and circumstances, i.e.,: (i) the I had been engaged in growing construction related to the project to F, the Chairperson of the Residents' Representative Meeting, is an unlawful act that can be punished as a crime of criminal breach of trust; and (ii) even if the I had actually been engaged in growing construction to F or having made such remarks to the Defendant.

Even if it is difficult to expect the truth to make a true statement, ② I’s legal statement related to solar and what kind of talks with the defendant are divided.

The first question of the defense counsel is the same as entering it in the general sense, and our complex does not do so, so we will do so at the end of the defendant's oral statement that "I would like to do so."

1.3 1.5

The answer shall continue thereafter.