1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds alleged in the court of first instance by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is re-

Therefore, the reasoning for this case is as follows: “The instant management regulations amended by Presidential Decree No. 23788, May 14, 2012; [Attachment Table 5] newly provide for “the detailed criteria for the recovery of project costs by private reason” as one of the grounds for recovery. The purpose of this case is to make it reasonable to recover research and development costs by preparing the standards for the recovery of research and development costs by fraud or other improper means (where research and development is conducted by fraud or other improper means, where research and development is conducted by fraud or other improper means).” This is to ensure that Article 11(3) of the former Framework Act on Science and Technology provides that “The Government shall implement national research and development projects transparently and fairly and efficiently, manage national research and development projects, and impose obligations to determine the planning, public announcement, etc. of national research and development projects, the selection of national research and development project tasks, agreement, etc., and so forth, it is difficult to view the additional grounds for recovery of research and development costs as the grounds for further specifying subparagraph 17(1)6).”.