logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.19 2015가단111539
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff 4,984,512 won, and each of the above amounts to the Plaintiffs 2,989,674 won and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On April 28, 2013, at around 15:50, K (L) was seated at the bottom of the Nart Elevator in Daegu-gu M. However, Defendant I, the owner of Nmaart, and Defendant J, the employee of the said Mart, used an elevator for cargo transport installed on the third floor of the said Mart to move wastes to one floor, while moving wastes from the third floor of the said Mart to the outside wall of the said building, he did not discover K and caused an accident between the elevator and the ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) As a result, K died of an injury, such as 4-5 square saves, saves, saves, light saves, etc., resulting in the injury and injury of light saves and saves.

3) Plaintiff A is the network K (hereinafter referred to as “the network,” and “the network”).

Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, and H are the deceased’s children. [The respective descriptions, images, and arguments of No. 1, No. 2, No. 2, A, No. 3, No. 4, and Evidence No. 7-1 through No. 24, based on recognition, are the wife of the deceased.]

B. According to the facts found as above, in order to operate an elevator for cargo transport as above, the defendants shall take measures such as installing safety structures or installing signboards to prevent the person from entering or approaching the place where the elevator is operated. In the case of operating an elevator, the defendants' duty of care to operate the elevator after checking whether there was a person on the top of the elevator or the first floor of the elevator, and without performing the duty of care to operate the elevator, the above elevator was operated without fulfilling the duty of care to operate the elevator. In the case of the accident resulting in the death of the deceased, the defendants were the perpetrator of the above illegal act, and as such, all damages suffered by the deceased and the plaintiffs.

arrow