The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

At around 10:00 on May 17, 2016, the Defendant in the factory room: (a) an elevator before the 6th floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Office opened a studio in order to open the elevator in the air; (b) thus, the elevator stringed in the future to board the elevator.

However, in front of an elevator at the time, there was a nameless female, etc. in the atmosphere in order to board the elevator, and there was also a person who gets off the elevator, and thus, the defendant was obliged to safely walk without being affected by others, and the person who intends to get off the elevator was confirmed to get off the elevator, and to have a duty of care to safely board the elevator so as not to cause damage to the surrounding people.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to find out that women waiting in front of the elevator are moving to the damaged place in the elevator while standing in front of the elevator, and it goes beyond the defendant's appearance due to the failure of the above name, and it was covered by the body length of the victim E (W, 74 years old) who was getting off from the elevator by the defendant's body and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment by the foregoing negligence, “the frame of the part of the body part of the other flasium.”

Provided, That the above facts charged constitute Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

According to the written agreement, the victim expressed his/her intention not to be subject to criminal punishment against the defendant on October 17, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, each of the above charges is expressed in favor of the victim's expressed intent to punish a case which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's expressed intent.