Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won, Defendant B, and C, respectively, by a fine of 700,000 won.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the representative of the “(State)F” located in Sinsan-si, and Defendant C and Defendant B are the employees of the above company, who are the children of Defendant A.
At around 15:00 on July 5, 2013, the Defendants: (a) reported that water flows into the factory by blocking the water from the drainage route of the “(P)F” due to the storm run within the “PP plant; and (b) contacted with the “PPP” water supply and drainage system; (c) on the ground that the victim G works in the “PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;
1. Some police interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. Each police statement of G and H;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;
1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;
1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the provisional payment order
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant A took one time the victim’s face face at the time and place indicated in the facts charged; (b) on the ground that the victim G arrives late.
2. There is a statement in the victim G investigative agency as evidence that corresponds to this part of the facts charged.
However, the circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, that is, the victim, who is the defendant A, can drink at the investigation agency.