logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고정824
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 8, 2020, the Defendant, at around 15:00, obstructed the victim’s solar-powered construction work by force, by setting up bitexs at the dry field and at the location of the road, on the ground that dry field and the operation of solar-powered construction vehicles, such as ready-mixed, etc., in operating solar-powered construction works within a considerable area of the Cheongju City, Cheongju City, and the victim C ( South and 56 years old) interfere with the victim’s solar construction work.

2. On May 12, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the victim C’s solar-powered construction work by force under the aforementioned method at the above place on May 12, 2020.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s assertion to the effect that a description of the police statement of the police report to C (the photo taken by a police officer on the spot), a photograph description (measurement of width, etc.), a photograph description (measurement of width, etc.), an investigation report (as to the currency with D above Chapter D), an investigation report (as to five tons truck width, height inspection, etc.) (as to the construction vehicle’s dry field was damaged by the Defendant’s dry field, the Defendant set up a bitex to pay attention, and thus, it does not go against social rules.

However, even if the Defendant’s dry field suffered damages as alleged by the Defendant, it does not seem impossible to prevent damage to the dry field by means of piling up posts on the road and dry field boundary, etc. In order to prevent such damage. The road of this case is 2.47 to 2.74 meters wide, and the construction vehicle of this case, which was trying to pass through the road of this case, was 2.38 to 2.40 meters long so that the width of the road was small, and the road of this case was lying toward the road of this case as the point where the winder was set up, and the road of this case was set up and set up by the Defendant with 50 centimeters wide from the direction of the road, thereby making it impossible to pass the road of this case, and making it impossible to pass the road of this case on the day of the construction work.

arrow