logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.17 2015고단1149
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The evidence No. 810 of the pressure of Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, was first to 2014.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operates a game room with the trade name “D” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant is a business owner operating the game room in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and E is a nominal business owner who, instead of lending and regulating the Defendant’s name as the business owner of the above game room, agrees to receive KRW 150,000 per day on condition that the Defendant attends an investigative agency

1. Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

A. From Apr. 1, 2014 to Feb. 21, 2014, the Defendant provided two external storage devices (USB) in which the game character was opened by means of automatic selection, regardless of the pressing manipulation of the user of the game, for the purpose of holding 40 game “frequency 3,” which was rated by the Game Rating Board from the game in the above game room, and then making it available for customers by inserting two game products into the main body of the game in which the game character was automatically selected.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classified game products for the use of customers, or displayed and stored them for this purpose.

B. From May 10, 2014 to October 28, 2014 of the same year, the Defendant provided two external storage devices (USB) inserted in the main body of each game machine in which the opened and altered implementation program was stored to the effect that the game was carried out for the purpose of having 40 games, which were rated by the Game Rating Board from the said game site, and then paying more game expenses from customers, the Defendant provided them for the use of the game.

As a result, the defendant provides game products with contents different from the classified game products for the use of customers.

arrow