beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operates a game room with the trade name of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F, and Defendant C is a person who served as an employee in the above game room from September 6, 201 to September 12, 201, and Defendant B from September 27, 201 to September 28, 2011.
1. The Defendants jointly committed a crime by Defendant A and Defendant C installed 40 game term “bricking” games, which included automatic progress differently from the contents of the rating classification of the Game Rating Board from around September 6, 2011 to around September 20:45, 201 (the Defendant C until September 12, 2011), and opened and altered the game to discharge free gifts without going beyond the following table, and offered them for customers’ use, and exchanged the premiums obtained through the game in KRW 4,500,000, excluding 10% commission per each game.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.
2. Defendant A and Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1), committed the operation of an illegal speculative game room, and thereafter, they were able to operate the game room in the same same place, and from September 27, 201 to September 23:30, 201, from around September 27, 2011 to around September 28, 2011, the automatic progress function is added differently from the contents of the rating of the Game Rating Board’s classification in the above game room, and 40 games opened and altered for the operation of game products using external storage devices were installed, and provided to customers for use, and they exchanged premiums obtained through the game in 4,500 won, excluding 10% commission fees per game.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to use game products with contents different from the rating obtained by the Game Rating Board, and acquired through the use of game products.