logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.25 2017가합291
임금
Text

1. The defendant,

A. Each money listed in the separate sheet “personal value” column for Plaintiffs E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and N, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 18, 2017, 201, the company, which was engaged in the manufacturing of electric districts and lamps in the Dobong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Company”). B.

The Plaintiffs are employees employed by the Defendant Company and retired on each day specified in the “Retirement Date” column in the separate sheet.

Plaintiff

K and M have retired from office in 2014, but have re-entered after retirement, and have retired again in 2016.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the plaintiffs provided labor and retired from the defendant company, the defendant did not pay each wage and retirement allowance (hereinafter "wages, etc.") as stated in the separate sheet "amount of claim" as stated in the separate sheet, so the defendant is obligated to pay the above money and damages for delay to the plaintiffs.

B. Although the existence of the Defendant’s claim as wages and other claims is recognized, the Defendant partially repaid the Defendant’s payment of wages and other claims against the Plaintiffs on December 2016, 2016, following: (a) around 10,423,550 Plaintiffs G10, K 2,000, M 5,000, M 500,000 around January 201, 2017, Plaintiff C2,500,000 Plaintiff C2,50,000, Plaintiff D2,62,870, 3,500, as indicated in the table below.

3. Determination

A. Since there is no dispute between the parties that the plaintiffs' judgment as to the cause of claim had worked in the defendant company and retired from the defendant company, and thus a claim for wages, etc. equivalent to the amount stated in the separate sheet "amount of claim" is created, the defendant, barring special circumstances, is stipulated in Article 37 (1) of the Labor Standards Act and Article 17 of the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standards Act from the date stated in the separate list "the initial date of calculation of delay damages" to the date of full payment.

arrow