logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.01.12 2016가단1327
배당이의
Text

1. The plaintiff (Appointed) and the succeeding intervenor's respective claims are dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed) and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) concluded an employment contract with the Donga Panel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Donga Panel”) on the date of their employment as indicated in the following table, and submitted each of them to be retired on June 1, 2014.

However, the Donga Panel did not pay part of wages and retirement allowances to the plaintiffs, and the detailed contents are as listed below.

Wages of 1 A 2012-09-01 wage of March 3, 2014, 300, 5000 wage of April 3, 2014, 3,506, 305, 204-6, 306, 3064, 206, 204-6, 306, 204, 205, 204, 206, 306, 204, 206, 205, 204, 205, 204, 206, 306, 204, 206, 204, 206, 306, 206, 204, 205, 206, 204, 206, 206, 3606, 204, 205, 2014

B. Meanwhile, on May 21, 2014, the SPG Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the Union SPS Panel”) is a factory building, site (the combination of the above factory building and site collectively referred to as “the instant real estate”) and its accessory machinery, located in the factory building, site (the combination of the above factory building and site) and its accessory machinery located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, which is owned by the East ASB Panel, around 200,00.

arrow