logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1990. 3. 31.자 90그12 결정
[부동산경락허가결정][공1990.7.1.(875),1231]
Main Issues

Special appeal against the decision to grant a successful bid in the procedure of compulsory auction (negative)

Summary of Decision

A decision to grant a successful bid in the procedure for compulsory auction may be filed by interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Article 641 (2) of the same Act, so it shall not be subject to a special appeal, as it does not correspond to a decision for which no appeal may be filed.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 420, 641(2) of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Order 83Na12 Dated July 13, 1983

Special Appellants

Kim Go-ro

United States of America

Gwangju District Court Order 89 Tagi5154 dated January 25, 1990

Text

The special appeal shall be dismissed.

Reasons

On the other hand, the special appeal stipulated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act can raise an objection against a ruling or order that is not allowed to file an objection, and the interested parties can file an immediate appeal in accordance with Article 641 (2) of the same Act with respect to the decision of permission of auction in the procedure of compulsory auction. Thus, the decision of permission of auction does not correspond to the decision that does not allow an objection, and thus, it cannot be a subject of a special appeal.

According to the records, the special appellant filed a special appeal of this case without filing an immediate appeal against the decision of permission for auction by compulsory auction of this case. This is unlawful and thus it cannot be exempted from rejection. Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee Chang-chul (Presiding Justice)

arrow