logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.07.21 2015구합67175
고용보험료 등 부과처분 무효 확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, from August 1, 2010 to September 30, 2013, engaged in the human resources placement business, etc. with the trade name “B”.

B. On September 13, 2013, the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service: (a) compared the Plaintiff with the total annual remunerations of the National Tax Service’s wage and salary income for the year 2012, the annual wage reported to the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service; and (b) reported the Plaintiff’

In the case of different facts, a certified public labor attorney who has been delegated by the Plaintiff submitted a written objection by facsimile to the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation (hereinafter “instant objection”). C. The Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, on October 15, 2013, notified the Plaintiff of the total amount of remuneration for the year 2012 pursuant to Article 16-6 of the Act on the Collection of Insurance Premiums, etc. for Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance and Article 16-3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act and Article 16-3 of the same Act, as a result of the survey on the total amount of remuneration for the year 2012, 7,080,000,017,160 won (i.e., unemployment premium for the annual total amount of remuneration 667,938,965 won (7,347,320 won, vocational ability development, 1,69,840 won). However, as the Plaintiff did not respond to the instant objection, the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, 53,00050,75000 won.

According to the purport of the notice of the foregoing survey collection, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the payment of the employment insurance premium of KRW 4,474,830 and the industrial accident insurance premium of KRW 3,513,580 on October 21, 2013, and the employment insurance premium of KRW 4,474,830 on November 20, 2013 and the industrial accident insurance premium of KRW 3,513,570, respectively.

(hereinafter the above notice is referred to as “instant disposition”). E.

The plaintiff is dissatisfied with the disposition of this case to the Central Administrative Appeals Commission.

arrow