logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.05.28 2014구합71986
산재보험료부과처분취소
Text

1. An industrial accident insurance premium and employment insurance premium, as shown in attached Table 1, that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiffs on October 20, 2014.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The plaintiffs are persons who are engaged in other workshop leasing business that assist their respective owners and their drivers at the request of the construction company as their main business to send them to the construction site.

On October 2014, the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare (Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare) determined as "construction machinery management business" under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Premium Table by Type of Business (No. 2013-56, Dec. 31, 2013) (hereinafter "the Ministry of Employment and Labor Notice No. 2013-56, Dec. 31, 2013), which was publicly announced by the Minister of Employment and Labor for the kinds of business of the Plaintiffs, as "construction machinery management business" under the same premise, calculated the Plaintiffs' industrial accident compensation insurance premium and employment insurance premium (hereinafter "industrial accident compensation insurance"; hereinafter "industrial accident insurance premium and insurance premium") and decided to impose industrial accident insurance premium, etc. paid to the Plaintiffs for the shortage in industrial accident insurance premium, etc. for the year 2014 and September 2014, and the industrial accident insurance premium for October 2014.

On October 20, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the payment of the industrial accident insurance premium, etc. as shown in the attached Table 1, according to the calculation details of the industrial accident insurance premium, etc. and the determination of imposition thereof by the Korea Workers' Compensation

(hereinafter “each disposition of this case” (hereinafter “each disposition of this case”). [Grounds for recognition”) did not dispute, each statement of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiffs asserted as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, together with a construction machinery driver, constitute a “construction machinery manager” belonging to a construction business in the 2014 business type forecast among the business type forecast publicly notified by the Commissioner of the Statistics Korea (Korea Standard Industrial Classification publicly notified by the Commissioner of Statistics Korea on December 28, 2007; hereinafter “Korea Standard Industrial Classification Table”).

The collection of insurance premiums, etc. for employment insurance and industrial accident compensation insurance.

arrow