A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by the Ulsan District Court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On November 7, 2019, at around 13:59, the Defendant driven a Mari-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

Accordingly, the defendant violated the Road Traffic Act's prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing criminal records, etc., investigation reports (attached to summary orders issued for the same kind of case A), and summary orders issued under the Ulsan District Act, No. 2011 high-ranking 1032 of the Ulsan District Act;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service order and order to attend the course of the punishment under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are to be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the accused has led to the instant crime and has been repented; (b) the accused has a record of drinking driving twice; and (c) the accused has a record of blood alcohol concentration and alcohol level; (d) the distance and age of drinking alcohol driving; (e) the age; (e) character and conduct; (e) the motive, means and consequence of the offense;