logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.07.03 2017가단1867
정산금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,820,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 30, 2018 to July 3, 2018; and (b) from the following day.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. around 2008, the Plaintiff and the Defendant jointly operated “D”, an enterprise for the manufacture and sale of beverages using walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm walm, etc.

around 2015, the Plaintiff reported on the distribution-specialized sales business at the Jeju City as the representative of C and reported the same year.

5. 27. Business Reports were accepted.

B. 1) An industry-academic cooperation foundation for Jeju University established in around 2014, to discover and support business starters with (preliminary) items for business start-up and high-class technology (hereinafter “instant business”).

(2) Around April 2014, the Defendant prepared the instant project application and project plan, and had the Plaintiff submit the relevant documents to the Jeju University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation. As a result, the Plaintiff (C) was selected as a business participating enterprise during the period from June 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, and was allocated subsidies of KRW 37,00,000 (hereinafter “instant subsidies”).

3) Of the instant subsidies, KRW 26,136,00 from September 23, 2014 to December 12, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were indicted on suspicion that “F, upon the Defendant’s request, deposited KRW 9,900,00 among the subsidies, deposited the Plaintiff’s account in the Plaintiff’s name, and KRW 16,236,00,000 each into the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant. 4) On October 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were convicted of having received the instant subsidies by deceiving the Jeju University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation as if the subsidies were normally used, and received the instant subsidies in an amount equivalent to the same amount by fraudulent application or other unlawful means,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive thereafter.

(hereinafter “relevant criminal case”). 5 The Plaintiff is the instant case.

arrow