logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 10. 17. 선고 2013두12133 판결
증여재산가액을 구성하는 주식가치 증가분에 대한 근거가 없어 위법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu29389 (Law No. 29, 2013.05)

Case Number of the previous trial

Examination Transfer 2010-0322 ( December 13, 2011)

Title

Since it is merely a simple exchange and cannot confirm the actual transfer value, the calculation of transfer margin is legitimate based on the standard market price.

Summary

In light of the details and contents of the conclusion of an exchange contract, it constitutes a case where the actual transfer value is not verifiable because it is merely a simple exchange, and there is no transaction example or no adequate appraisal value, the transfer value shall not be based on the standard market price and in this case, the acquisition value shall be based on the

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2013Du12133 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

LAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Sungnam Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu29389 Decided May 29, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow