Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operated a "F" entertainment center in E when he/she is in harmony.
1. No chain store specializing in credit finance business shall lend the name of a credit card merchant to any third party;
Nevertheless, from September 26, 2013 to December 2014, the Defendant lent the name of the Defendant F (name A of the representative) credit card merchant at the “I” entertainment drinking place located in the G in the G in Sungsung-si from Sep. 26, 2013 to December 2014.
2. On December 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (a) the Victim D, who was a passenger of H and H, to take over the F the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant’s business to KRW 80 million; (b) the Defendant
“.” At the end of December of the same year, “Around the end of the same year, H had to use the F in excess of the F for a business operator operating Jsing in an adjacent apartment.” At I, “F upon the receipt of the F’s consent, and H was to operate the F only by the end of February 2015, but the fact did not have an intention to sell the F to the said H and the victim.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving H as above and transferred 30 million won as the down payment around January 6, 2015 and 20 million won as the intermediate payment around the 9th day of the same month from the victim D to the Defendant’s agricultural bank (Account Number:K).
3. Around April 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed the following acts: (b) at the time of performing a construction project involving the interior interior interior interior interior interior interior of the Victim H (L, 54 years old); (c) at least 30 square meters exceeding the business license area; and (d) at the time of using the Defendant’s credit card member store name on loan, and (e) at the time of threatening the victim to receive money and valuables, such as paragraph (1).
On February 26, 2015, the Defendant: “The Defendant reported the victim’s tax evasion to the National Tax Service, and prepared to unlawfully see I for the purpose of viewing the emulation, and that B would not be subject to 20 million won.”