A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the head of F agency, a foundation established in Busan Shipping Daegu E, and F agency, a foundation (hereinafter “G”) is a policy research institute established with the contribution of the Busan City.

1. On August 5, 2015, F institutions that interfere with the employment-related business affairs in 2015 publicly announced the employment of employees and conducted the employment procedures in the second half of the year 2015 from August 10, 2015 to September 1, 2015, and among them, received applications for the first half of the year 2015 (from August 10, 2015).

8. 19.19.), a document screening (10 multiples selected on August 20, 2015), a written examination (4 multiples selected on August 22, 2015), and an interview screening ( August 26, 2015) shall determine and employ a final successful applicant.

Pursuant to the above schedule, 30 applicants who have passed a written examination among 95 applicants for initial recruitment (21 applicants among 30 applicants) were selected by 12 successful applicants for written examinations (persons subject to interview).

On August 25, 2015, the Defendant reported the list of 12 persons who passed the written examination from H from the person in charge of personnel management of the F agency, but notified H of the fact that I did not pass the written examination with 14 persons, etc., the Defendant knew that he did not pass the written examination, and instructed H of the first 14 persons who passed the written examination so that he could pass the written examination.

H prepared a “written examination result and interview planning report” with the content that “in order to include I, who was entrusted to HR, a specialized employment company (ju), as a result of the examination by the Defendant’s instruction, is 14th degree of 71.1% of the so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called “disqualified test” and, in order to include I, who was judged to be disqualified (if the so-called so-called response is at least 60%), as a successful applicant in the written examination, on the ground that I received a written test for duties classification C, based on the fact that I received a written test for duties classification C, “the result and interview planning report” with the content that “the person’s personal ability test results is determined to be higher than C,” and then I

I did not know that he was selected as a successful applicant in the written examination in the above way.