logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.26 2014가단162212
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for ownership confirmation against the Defendants is dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs defendant E.

Reasons

1. The underlying factual network H was assessed on May 8, 1917, 198 at KRW 8,6,000,000 from the 1st six levels of forest land in Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

The above land was divided into J, K, and L on March 31, 1932.

On January 20, 1936, M & N received transfer of ownership on January 20, 193, and M and N again received transfer of ownership on March 5, 1941 after H received the aforementioned circumstances.

On April 5, 1952, the P land was divided from the above J land, and the P land was divided on August 1, 1964 from the above O land.

The land category of 1,924 square meters prior to Jincheon-gun G (hereinafter “instant land”) appears to be part of the land whose land category has been changed from the aforesaid P forest land.

P 595㎡ of forest land currently exists separately.

(A) Evidence No. 6 and Evidence No. 8-1). H died on October 1, 1935, and Q, A, died earlier, and Q, Q, Q, a wife of Q, succeeded to H.

M adopted R on May 27, 1939, and died on March 5, 1953 and succeeded to M.

R died on January 2, 1990, and on February 7, 1991, S, his wife, died, and his children had T, A, B, D, and U, but U was the wife, V, and C, and died first of all.

From among R's remaining successors, T and VI renounced inheritance, and Plaintiff A, B, Plaintiff D, and Plaintiff C agreed on the division of inherited property to inherit the R's inherited property on January 31, 2013, respectively.

On March 18, 1985, the registration of ownership preservation was completed for R and Defendant E to co-ownership of 1/2 shares in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer, etc. of Real Estate Ownership (Act No. 3562).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 (including Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 5, witness W's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiffs’ legitimacy of the part regarding the claim for confirmation of ownership among the instant lawsuit is that the instant land was registered in title with the R and Defendant E as the property of the Defendant clan.

arrow