1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership of each real estate listed in attached Form 1 shall be dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The land investigation division prepared by the State of the Provisional Land Investigation Division in the Japanese colonial Rule during the Japanese Occupation Period is indicated as being subject to the circumstances of “F” with the address of “F” in 1911 [the 1911 [the 44 years]. The land investigation division prepared by the State of the Japanese Government of the Japanese Government of the Japanese Government of the Republic of Korea (current, the change of administrative district, etc. to “Gri-gun”; hereinafter “Dri”) E (hereinafter “E”)

B. H Return 593 E (hereinafter “H”) was divided into E.

H was replaced with an I 803 square meters and J 805 square meters according to the farmland improvement project.

(No. 12, 1979). (c) The date on which the farmland improvement completion report is filed.

On May 1, 1996, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership”) under Article 23732 of the Receiving Registry of the Suwon District Court on May 1, 1996, following the procedure for public announcement of non-owned real estate with respect to J 805 square meters.

Since J 805 square meters, each land listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as "land listed in paragraph (1)") is divided into each land listed in attached Table 1, and I 803 square meters into each land listed in attached Table 2 (hereinafter referred to as "land listed in paragraph (2)"). The land listed in paragraph (2) is unregistered.

E. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Plaintiff’s fleet K had a permanent domicile in “Usu-gun Lri (the present change to Mari-ri due to the change of administrative district, etc.)” and the O died on December 12, 1953 and succeeded to the family head of family.

O Along with the death of October 12, 2001, P, Q, R, S, and T, a spouse, succeeded to the property of P, Q, R, S, and T, a spouse.

(Inheritance Shares: Plaintiffs 3/13, P, Q, R, S, and T 2/13). The fact that there is no dispute as to the ground for recognition, each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 12 (including a provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Of the instant lawsuit, the claim for confirmation of land ownership against the State as to the part of the claim for confirmation of land ownership regarding paragraph (1) is unlawful, and no land is registered, and it is impossible to identify the registrant or the registrant on the land cadastre or the forest land cadastre, and the State continues to assert the State’s ownership while denying a third party’s ownership as the registrant.