logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단6760
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant posted a letter to suggest sexual traffic by using “C” in a smartphone-making and fluoring c, and agreed on the condition of sexual traffic with a police officer in charge of regulating the contact by reporting the posting and holding 150,000 won, and, upon entering into the Mocom “E” in the gold-si Si, the Defendant arranged to enter the place above the Fropod passenger lane and to protect B by waiting for the said place, including the act of arranging B to perform sexual intercourse with a police officer in a way that he/she takes the role of protecting B from around September 1, 2016 to around September 8, 2016, the Defendant arranged for sexual traffic using the above smartphone and arranged for sexual traffic by dividing the price for sexual traffic that he/she received from the male and female purchasing from B from around September 1, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the content of conversation and the statutes governing field pictures;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection, the Defendant again went to commit the instant crime even though he had been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime. In light of the content and method of the instant crime, the nature of the crime is poor.

However, considering the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant, the brokerage period for commercial sex acts is not long, the defendant has no record of being punished in excess of the fine prior to the disposition of this case, and other overall sentencing conditions shown in the records and changes theory, such as the defendant's age and sexual behavior, are comprehensively considered, the sentence is ordered as ordered.

arrow