The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Summary of the facts charged of this case

A. A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, including the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), the Defendant, around November 2016, came to know in D (hereinafter referred to as “C”), which came to know in D (the age of 16) of smartphone-sharing c, want to pay money from 20 years of age.

“Hearing the horses to the effect that “,” and having expressed mind to arrange the sexual traffic of the said D.

1) On December 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 180,000 won for sexual traffic from the non-existent male in return for the payment of sexual traffic; and (b) assisted the said male to engage in sexual intercourse in the Macdong near the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (c) assisted the said male to engage in sexual intercourse in D and Macdong.

2) On December 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 180,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from the non-existent men in the vicinity of the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (b) assisted the said male to engage in sexual intercourse in the her motherel near the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (c) assisted the said male to engage in sexual intercourse.

B. On December 23, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (such as brokerage, etc.) is a high school student from D around December 23, 2016.

Recognizing the word "," and even though the above D knew that it was a juvenile, he was willing to arrange sexual traffic.

Accordingly, at around 02:10 on December 24, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 180,000 from G as the price for sexual traffic, through “C” in the Seongbuk-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and caused the said G to engage in sexual intercourse at the motherel near the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant assisted the purchase of sex of children and juveniles.

2. Summary of reasons for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding (as to the violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) on December 15, 2016), the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant, the police's statement against D concerning the defendant.