logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.27 2014가합70545
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1 The parties’ status 1) The Defendant medical corporation C is a G hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

(2) On August 21, 2013, Defendant D and E were medical corporations operating the Defendant hospital, and Defendant F was the father and doctor of the Defendant hospital, and Defendant F was the father and doctor of the child affiliated with the Defendant hospital. (2) Plaintiff B delivered son (hereinafter “the deceased”) at the Defendant hospital, but the deceased was born after childbirth.

Plaintiff

A is the spouse of the plaintiff B.

B. On August 3, 2013, Plaintiff B was subject to the early radio wave test at the Defendant Hospital (No. 37th day of new shares). At the time, Defendant D, who diagnosed the said Plaintiff, stated that it was R/O let CP (referring to narrowest ebbbbs compared to the size of the ebs) in the outer record. The same content is also stated in the outer record as of August 19, 2013. (2) Plaintiff B was located in the Defendant Hospital on August 20, 2013 (No. 39th day of new shares) 22:40.

The defendant hospital hospitalized the above plaintiff in order to observe the actual truth.

At the time, Defendant E, a doctor on duty, was working in the Defendant Hospital, and the nurse H and the midwife I inspected fetus hearts, and the extent of the scarbbling of the scarb and the scarb.

The records of the delivery room of the defendant hospital include ‘R/O outright CPD and anti-natural birth rate.'

3) On August 21, 2013, Plaintiff B opened 00:20 m (3-4 m) to a natural delivery center, and entered the natural delivery center. At around 04:50 on the same day, Plaintiff B opened the complete alteration of the Gindo Gindo, and the fetus was seen to have been 2 cm from the above Plaintiff’s Madem, and on the same day, the 05:10 on the same day, the 2.91k m (2.91k) lost the Madem, immediately after the birth of Plaintiff B. (C. 1) the Madem, the Madem’s Madem was 8,5-5-10%, and the Madem’s Madem was entered the Madem on August 21, 2013, until August 21, 2013:

A fetus's physical measurement and physical examination conducted immediately after the entry of a newborn baby room shall be seen as the left-hand eye.

arrow