logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.06.15 2016고단154
사기
Text

1. Defendant U.S. shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 21, 2015, the Changwon District Court was sentenced to four years and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 29, 2015.

Defendant

B made a loan consultation to a person who intends to obtain a loan and gave a guidance on the procedures necessary for the loan, and introduced a person who requested a loan to a daily "E" daily, using a false certificate of employment, etc. to allow the loan requester to obtain a loan from the installment financing company, etc. and then obtain a profit as a fee.

Defendant

U requested Defendant B to grant a loan, and Defendant B, even though he was aware that he could not get a loan from a financial institution in a normal way due to the lack of a certain occupation or income, purchased a motor vehicle with a false statement of Defendant U’s workplace information, and sold the motor vehicle under the so-called --called ---called ----called -- which disposes of the

Defendant

U around May 6, 2013, according to the above public offering, purchased XK7 car from W in Gwangju Northern-gu V, Gwangju, and applied for a loan as if the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. would normally repay the installment loan.

However, even if the car was purchased, it was disposed of to another person by the so-called --called ---called ----called "vehicle -" method, and there was no intention to operate the car actually, and there was no intention or ability to pay the loan normally due to the lack of a certain occupation or import.

Defendant

U was granted KRW 29.2 million by the injured party as a loan for installment financing on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim, thereby deceiving 29.2 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants prepared by the public prosecutor

1. Statement of Qua prepared by the police.

arrow