The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's fault in the occurrence of a traffic accident is found in the occurrence of the traffic accident, since the defendant did not violate the signal.

subsection (b) of this section.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court may recognize the fact that the Defendant has caused a traffic accident in violation of the signal.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

(1) The victim consistently states that “The third left-hand turn is turned to the left-hand signal at the investigative agency, and the vehicle signal, etc. is changed to the left-hand turn, and the two-price left-hand turn at the front of the damaged vehicle was reported to proceed to the left-hand turn.”

When the new name of the lane where the damaged vehicle in the signal system of the intersection in which the accident occurred is left left, the signal of the lane operated by the defendant is already changed to the red signal.

② The point where an accident occurred was located in two lanes in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and the Defendant’s vehicle received more parts of the right fences of the damaged vehicle.

When considering the fact that the damaged vehicle is the combined vehicle, which is a two-lane-lane-lane-on-road, and that the knick-on-road strings at a normal speed, there was an interval of time from the time when the damaged vehicle started the U-turn-on-road.

may be seen.

(3) A victim made a statement to the effect that the Defendant exceeded the stop line when changed to yellow signal immediately after the accident.

The argument is asserted.

The Defendant made a statement at the investigative agency to the effect that the fact that he made such remarks at the time was recognized (the investigative record No. 39). 4 The Defendant did not receive an accident to the police station immediately after the accident, and sought to request the victim to accept an accident, and to change only once a day because he did not receive an accident to the victim.

As to the reasons therefor, the defendant.