The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the instant accident occurred when the Defendant was sent to the left-hand turn at the U.S. permitted point of the U.S. to the U.S., and the Defendant was found to have driven the Defendant’s vehicle on the front side while passing through the intersection with violating the signal and proceeding as it is, and the Defendant’s vehicle was shocked.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the premise that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the defendant was erroneous and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below acknowledged the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. ① The victim consistently stated that the front road of the Samdong-dong Gyeongdong apartment on the day of the instant case was carried out in accordance with the direct progress signal from the front side of the school dong-dong Gyeongdong-gu to the front side of the front side of the front school, and the images stored in the video recording device correspond (it cannot be accepted in light of the witness G's statement and the expert report of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation in light of the fact that the part unfavorable to the defendant is intentionally deleted, etc.). ② The witness F of the court below, who was in the front of the Defendant's signal for U-dong, stated that the accident occurred during the direct progress signal of the Defendant, and ③ if the Defendant's progress signal is sent to the left as alleged by the Defendant, the victim's progress signal in the signal system at the point of the instant accident should be red signal. In full view of the above, the accident of this case should be determined by the Defendant's negligence in advance.