The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was not in violation of the signal at the time of the instant accident.

2. Comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, as it sufficiently recognizes that the Defendant received the damaged vehicle that was driven on the opposite lane due to the negligence in violation of the Intersection signal at the time of the instant accident.

① The signal system of the intersection of this case is, in the case of the defendant's proceeding, that the vehicle signal, etc. is to be changed to a red signal after turning on the yellow signal from 3 seconds straight straight to 3 seconds, and in the case of the victim's proceeding direction, the red signal is to be changed to 3 seconds later, and the pedestrian signal, etc. in the crosswalk is to be changed to a green, and the pedestrian signal, etc. in the crosswalk is to be changed to 1 lane at the time of pedestrian signal, and the pedestrian signal is to be allowed to be cut off on the one lane. The victim F attempted to turn off the crosswalk in accordance with the previous vehicle after checking the vehicle signal, etc., consistently from the investigative agency to the court below, and checking the red signal, etc. to be changed to the red light, and pedestrians at the time began to enter the crosswalk, and after about 5 seconds to 10 seconds after the vehicle signal, etc. was changed to the red light.

② A witness of the instant accident, I confirmed that, while waiting in front of the victimized vehicle, the vehicle signal, etc. was red and attempted to provide a U-turn, pedestrians were entering the crosswalk at the time, and the vehicle passed after approximately three seconds have passed since the signal, etc. for the vehicle was changed to red.

③ According to CCTV images around the instant intersection, a non-motor vehicle driven along one lane in the direction of the Defendant’s running at the time when the Defendant’s vehicle enters the instant intersection as a two-lane, stops ahead of the instant intersection by reducing the speed.