1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion is a person who operates the "D" of the piracy Global Co., Ltd., Ltd., a illegal multilevel marketing and a similar receiving company (hereinafter "piracy Global").

The Defendant, by deceiving the Plaintiffs that it would be able to obtain high profits if he purchases and leases sports equipment, such as sound, vibration, etc., and received KRW 203,00,000 in total from Plaintiff A as the purchase price for sports equipment from August 4, 2014 to November 25, 2014, and acquired KRW 101,20,000 in total from Plaintiff B from February 5, 2015 to February 11, 2015.

Therefore, the defendant is the amount calculated by subtracting the money received from the money paid to the plaintiff A for the purchase price of KRW 110,900,000 and the money paid to the plaintiff A for the above tort.

Plaintiff

B same shall apply to B

Plaintiff

B is liable to pay KRW 80,886,860 respectively.

2. The fact that the Defendant operated the “D” of the piracy Global, and the executives and employees, including the global representative director of the piracy global clinic, were convicted of the Defendant for criminal facts, such as fraud against the Plaintiffs.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant involved in illegal acts, such as fraud, by participating in attracting investment or concluding a sales contract for the plaintiffs.

Rather, the following circumstances are recognized, and the plaintiffs' assertion based on the premise that the defendant is a joint tortfeasor is not accepted.

① A sales contract (Evidence A through 4, 6, and 7) made between the Plaintiffs and the piracy global includes the “F” operated by E, not the “D” operated by the Defendant, as a sales store.

On the other hand, the defendant does not know the plaintiffs at all.

② “D” appears to be a superior agency of “F” as a form-based total board, but in fact, all of the above two places were operated independently.

3. E also is an investor of “F” and “F” at an investigative agency.