The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the DNA appraisal results submitted by the prosecutor as evidence, it is sufficient to recognize the defendant and the person subject to an attachment order (hereinafter the defendant) as the criminal of the crime of this case. However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant as to the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. Determination:

가. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2009. 2. 1. 06:50경 통영시 C에 있는 피해자 D(여, 39세) 운영의 소주방에 딸린 주거지 앞에 이르러 시정되어 있지 않은 창문을 양손으로 뜯어내고 방 안으로 침입한 다음 혼자 잠을 자고 있던 피해자의 목 부분에 미리 소지하고 있던 흉기인 칼을 들이대어 쿡쿡 찌르면서 “소리를 지르면 죽인다”라고 말하고, 피해자가 입고 있던 팬티를 벗겨 피해자의 입안에 넣고 방바닥에 있던 테이프로 입술 주위를 감은 다음 벨트로 피해자의 양손을 감아 묶고 이불로 뒤집어씌운 후 재차 피해자에게 “조용히 해라, 소리 지르면 죽인다”라고 위협하여 피해자의 반항을 억압하였다.

Then, the Defendant taken out the amount of 103,00 won in cash in the part of the injured party suffering from his wall, the amount of KRW 103,000,000, the National Bank passbook, the agricultural bank passbook, the agricultural bank card, and one copy of the agricultural bank card, and had the injured party less the card password in the part of the wall.

The Defendant continued to put the fingers into the part of the victim’s sound, inserted the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, and raped under the circumstances.

B. Although the defendant's accurate date is not memory, the defendant's defense room entered the above party room on January 30, 2009 or around January 31, 2009 of the same month by viewing that the defendant's defense room was flicked on the way that the defendant flick crew and drinks with the flick crew at around 02:00 on the following day, he she flicked with the flick crew and returned to flickly.