The Defendant’s motion to attach the instant attachment order is dismissed.

1. 공소사실 및 부착명령청구 원인사실의 요지 [공소사실] 피고인 겸 피부착명령청구자(이하 ‘피고인’이라고 한다)는 2009. 2. 1. 06:50경 통영시 C에 있는 피해자 D(여, 39세) 운영의 소주방에 딸린 주거지 앞에 이르러 시정되어 있지 않은 창문을 양손으로 뜯어내고 방 안으로 침입한 다음 혼자 잠을 자고 있던 피해자의 목 부분에 미리 소지하고 있던 흉기인 칼을 들이대어 쿡쿡 찌르면서 “소리를 지르면 죽인다”라고 말하고, 피해자가 입고 있던 팬티를 벗겨 피해자의 입안에 넣고 방바닥에 있던 테이프로 입술 주위를 감은 다음 벨트로 피해자의 양손을 감아 묶고 이불로 뒤집어씌운 후 재차 피해자에게 “조용히 해라, 소리 지르면 죽인다”라고 위협하여 피해자의 반항을 억압하였다.

Then, the Defendant taken out the amount of 103,00 won in cash in the part of the injured party suffering from his wall, the amount of KRW 103,000,000, the National Bank passbook, the agricultural bank passbook, the agricultural bank card, and one copy of the agricultural bank card, and had the injured party less the card password in the part of the wall.

The Defendant continued to put the fingers into the part of the victim’s sound, inserted the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, and raped under the circumstances.

[Judgment of the court below] The defendant's ground for requesting an attachment order is that the defendant committed a sexual crime on at least two occasions, thereby recognizing the habit of the crime and committing a sexual crime.

2. The gist of the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion was that the defendant drinking alcohol in the kitchen operated by the victim at the time of the instant case and had sexual contact with the victim with the victim with the consent of the victim. However, as stated in the facts charged, there was no fact that the victim took property by force after suppressing the victim's resistance with a deadly weapon, and raped the victim.

3. Review of the record of recognition reveals the following facts. A.

. The victim.