logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.05.09 2014고단180
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 1, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 1, 2013, and committed the following crimes under the status that the enforcement of the said sentence was completed in the Seoul Southern Southern District Court, and that the Defendant committed the following crimes under the status that the Defendant was unable to separate things or make decisions due to intellectual disorder:

"2014 Highest 180"

1. The Defendant, at around 12:00 on October 18, 2013, at a pharmacy operated by the victim D in Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, and even though there was no fact that he purchased the Huri Protection Zone, he collected one Huri Protection Zone, which was kept in the display stand, and then purchased the previous Mari Protection Zone to the victim as if he had purchased it, “I would like to receive a refund, and I would like to receive a refund from this place,” and received 40,000 won from the victim, i.e., a refund from the victim, from the above date and time to January 20, 2014, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table, by deceiving the victims by the above method 16 times in total, and received KRW 2,284,000 from the victims as a refund.

2. Attempted fraud;

A. On November 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at a pharmacy operated by the Victim F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul on November 11, 2013; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant purchased biometric tons, which is a medicine, at the same time, the following 3-A.

As stated in paragraph (1), the market price of the stolen possession shows one copy of 150,000 won to the victim, and the victim would have received money for the purpose of refund by falsely stating that “I would like to receive refund,” as if I had purchased the previous ownership, the victim attempted to receive money for the purpose of refund. However, the “balton” was not the goods sold at his/her pharmacy, but the goods sold at his/her pharmacy, and was refused to refund, and thus, the victim escaped and attempted to refund.

B. On December 22, 2013, the Defendant is a victim H in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 18:07.

arrow