logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.12.04 2013고정1
무고
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around May 4, 2011, the Defendant drafted a written complaint stating that “C uses the shot-type pen on August 7, 2010 and borrowed KRW 40,000,000 for borrowed money,” using the shot-type pen in the Jeonju prison room No. 515 located in the Jeonju-dong, Jeonju-dong, Pung-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Yan-dong, and thus, “C uses only one day around August 7, 2010, and lends the money for borrowing money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant: (a) conspiredd with C and illegal private gambling, to “mast-to-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-mast-Ma

Nevertheless, on May 9, 2011, the defendant submitted the above written complaint to the staff in charge of receipt of the complaint of the former main prosecutor's office through the prison officer of the former correctional institution.

As a result, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

2. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant did not admit C.

In fact, C shall be used only a day, and 40,000 won shall be loaned from the defendant, and it shall not be repaid.

In addition, upon C’s request, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that it corresponds to the facts charged in the prosecution.

3. We examine the judgment, and C consistently stated in the investigative agency that “The defendant and himself were gambling in the atmosphere of correction, etc.” The defendant sent 40,000 won to the account used by the gambling broker, and the defendant did not borrow 40,000 won from the defendant.” In light of the fact that the prosecutor stated that the defendant made the statement in compliance with C’s above statement at the prosecutor’s office that he did not go against C, there is a strong doubt as to whether the defendant was not guilty, such as the facts charged.

However, in addition to the defendant's statement at the prosecutor's office, C's statement is the only fact about the facts charged in this case.

arrow