logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1967. 2. 20.자 65마1119 결정
[가압류집행처분취소결정에대한재항고][집15(1)민,106]
Main Issues

The nature of provisional disposition as stipulated in Article 507(2) of the Civil Procedure Act.

Summary of Judgment

With respect to a provisional disposition under Section 2 of this Article, no appeal may be made by analogy of Section 3 of this Article.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 507(2) of the Civil Procedure Act

Re-appellant

Correspondings

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 65Ra72 delivered on November 1, 1965

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The provisional disposition stipulated in Article 507 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act is ad hoc measure until a judgment is rendered after a complaint is filed by the nature of the disposition. Thus, it is interpreted that the main source of appeal is to make it impossible to file an objection by analogy of Article 473 (3) of the same Act (see Supreme Court Order 61Ma327, Oct. 19, 1961). As to an appeal against the decision on revocation of this case, the original decision that dismissed ex officio on the ground that the appeal is unlawful, is without merit.

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices of the Supreme Court Dog-gu (Presiding Judge) Dog-Jak and Mag-gu Mag-gu

arrow
심급 사건
-광주지방법원 1965.11.1.선고 65라72