(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.20 2018나50850

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.20 2018나50850

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) adding the phrase “public notice by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport under Article 59 or 61 of the Aviation Act” to the front of the fourth second part of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) adding the following judgments to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) cite it as is in accordance with the main sentence

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff asserts that "if the underwater franchise of this case is separated, it is divided into "the ship portion" and "the part other than the ship portion," and even if the ship portion is not allowed to be carried into the entrusted baggage, the other part should be allowed to be carried into the entrusted baggage, but it is unreasonable to allow the defendant to carry it into the aircraft by carrying it directly without allowing the plaintiff to carry it into the entrusted baggage as well as the other part."

B. Considering the following circumstances, it is difficult to view that the Defendant did not allow the Plaintiff to bring the goods into an aircraft by carrying them directly without allowing the Plaintiff to bring them into an entrusted baggage, as well as the parts other than the parts of the Suchiton’s distribution of this case, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

1) The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced pursuant to Articles 59 through 61 of the Aviation Act “standard for transport of dangerous articles by air” (hereinafter “Air Act notification”).

(ii) Even if it is interpreted to the effect that it is also permitted to carry a hand-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-

It is clear that this sub-chip is carried in as consigned baggage.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2015. 2. 12. 선고 2015고합6 판결

-서울고등법원 2015. 5. 22. 선고 2015노800 판결

-대법원 2017. 12. 21. 선고 2015도8335 전원합의체 판결

-대법원 2009. 11. 12. 선고 2009도8751 판결

-대법원 2006. 9. 22. 선고 2005두2506 판결