beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
○○○○○○ (Attorney Kim Jong-do, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Defendant
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 8, 2018
The first instance judgment
Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016Da210836 Decided July 14, 2017
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
In relation to the accident described in paragraph (1) of the order of the court of first instance, it is confirmed that the plaintiff's damage liability against the defendant does not exist more than 448,630 won.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows. In relation to the accident described in paragraph (1) of the order of the court of first instance, it is confirmed that the plaintiff's damage liability against the defendant does not exist more than 16,480,149 won.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, we accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act [This court has reviewed the defendant's argument again and cannot accept it for the same reason as the judgment of the
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
Judges Park Jae-sik (Presiding Judge)