logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.10.23 2013재고합4
대통령긴급조치제9호위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged and the progress of the case

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant was a person who was enrolled in two years in the business management department at C University and was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on June 19, 1978 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9, and one year and six months of suspension of qualifications, and the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed on September of the same year and its punishment became final and conclusive on March 1, 1978. (1) On March 1, 1978. (3) around 06:40 on March 1, 1978, when the Defendant was under guard, D, E, etc. who were under guard in his room in the area of 101 Seoul Western-gu, Seoul High Court No. 10199, May 18, 1978.

4. From 10:00 on 19.10: G, H, I, and J, etc. which were in the same room in the above room, the following measures are repeatedly taken 50 times repeatedly at a large interest in providing relief: “The removal of an emergency measure, the removal of a new constitution, the removal of a single financial right, the release of a single political offender, the release of a political offender, the suspension of a private teaching institute inspection,” and 3.

5. 18. 05:40 on 18. 05. 05. 40, to the extent that “Direct Election is held, Emergency Measures are released, and the New Constitution is removed and removed, 10 times repeatedly and repeatedly, 4.0 times in large interest, such as I, H, J, K, and K.

6. At around 17:30, around 29:17:12, the above detention house had been located in the said room with L et al., adjacent to L et al., claiming the abolition of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea through a distort of each fact and demonstration by repeatedly exposing ten times more than 10 times in large interest for relief, such as the removal of emergency measures, the removal of the new Constitution, the removal of the German financial right, the suspension of inspection by a private teaching institute, etc.

B. On February 9, 1979, the Daejeon District Court rendered a judgment of conviction and the Daejeon District Court rendered a judgment of conviction against the defendant, 78 Gohap152 delivered on February 9, 1979, and 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant.

arrow