logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.02.07 2013재고합3 (1)
대통령긴급조치제9호위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be published against the defendant.

Reasons

1. According to the summary of the facts charged and the records of the case progress, the following facts may be acknowledged.

The summary of the facts charged is as follows.

"Defendant" was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment and 10 months of suspension of qualifications for violating the presidential emergency measures for the national security and the protection of public order at the Seoul District Criminal Court on February 1, 1978, and was dismissed by the Seoul High Court on June 23, 1978, and appealed again on June 23, 1978, and was transferred from the Seoul District Court to the Cheongju prison on July 7, 1978 while the judgment was pending in the Supreme Court;

1. On March 1, 1978, around 01:10 on March 1, 1978, E, et al., being able to take place in five and five and a large number of reduction of the number of inmates being able to take place on the side of E, the Seoul Detention House No. 2.5, and “F killed, Dempiced, locating a democracy, removed a new constitution, and released consciences” are being taken out once in large interest of relief;

2. On June 26 of the same year, at around 06:30, G et al., and three and a large number of prisoners being confined in the same room at the same room, both G et al. and on the side of the same room, “the removal of a new constitution,” “the release of a person suspected of committing a crime”, “the release of a person suspected of committing a crime,” and “the release of an emergency measure,” shall be taken three times in large interest, respectively;

3. At around 17:15 on the same day, at the same time, the inmates as described in paragraph 2 above are exposed to three times at a large interest rate, each of which publicly slanders No. 9 of the presidential emergency measures and claims the abolition of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea by means of demonstration.

''

B. On September 12, 1978, the Defendant rendered a judgment of conviction against the Defendant and became final and conclusive. The Defendant’s “Emergency Measures for the National Security and the Protection of Public Order” (hereinafter “Emergency Measures No. 9”) in the Cheongju District Court 78 Gohap71 Decided September 12, 1978.

Paragraphs 7 and 1-

(b) and (d);

A two years of imprisonment with prison labor and suspension of qualifications for committing a crime of violation of this paragraph (hereinafter “instant judgment subject to a retrial”) and appeal to the said appeal, but on December 11, 1978.

arrow