The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged and the progress of the case

A. The summary of the facts charged of this case is that the defendant was a person who was in the third grade of C University, Literature University, and was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on June 28, 1978 to imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months for the violation of the Presidential Emergency Decree 9, and the suspension of qualification at that Seoul High Court at that time, and the punishment becomes final and conclusive by waiver of the final appeal. 1) On May 18, 1978, the defendant asserted that, around 06:30 on May 18, 1978, at the fourth and fourth level of the Seoul High Court, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul High Court, Seoul High Court D and four other prisoners in prison, and the subsequent reduction of the number of prisoners, "Cancellation of emergency measures and release of the conscientious crime, removal of the U.S. Constitution, Doctrine, and free election," and argued that the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9 is openly distorted by repeating six times, and that the Korean Constitution was abolished by means of demonstration. 2)

6. 26. 06. 06. 06. 0. 06. 10. D and three inmates in the above-mentioned places are large so that they can listen to the reliefs, “the removal of a new constitution” means five and six repeated handling of the reliefs, thus asserting the abolition of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea by means of demonstration, and three identical days;

6. At around 17:15, at the above location, prisoners in the above D and three other locations and in the next room, “the removal and removal of the new constitution” means a large interest so that they can be heard, “the removal and removal of the emergency measures” means a public action against the President Emergency Decree No. 9 and the abolition of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea in a manner of demonstration.

B. In the case of the Daejeon District Court on February 9, 1979, the judgment of conviction and the final and conclusive Daejeon District Court found the Defendant guilty, and sentenced the Defendant to one year and six months of imprisonment and one year and one year of suspension of qualification (hereinafter “the judgment of retrial”) and the appeal against the judgment of retrial was withdrawn on August 13, 1979, and the judgment of retrial became final and conclusive.

C. As to the judgment subject to a retrial by the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9, the above charges are sought.