The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, it is just to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of criminal facts as to the charge of forging private documents and uttering of falsified investigation documents among the facts charged in the instant case, embezzlement around June 27, 2010, and embezzlement due to the refusal to return equipment owned by D Co., Ltd. around August 2010. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by violating the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.