All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below with respect to Defendant A’s appeal in light of the evidence, the court below was just in holding that Defendant A was guilty of occupational embezzlement among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there was no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to the criminal intent of embezzlement, contrary to

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record as to the prosecutor’s appeal, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment and acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of criminal facts as to the acceptance of bribe and the offering of bribe related to the certification of solar light chains of Defendant A and Defendant D among the facts charged in the instant case, and affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendant A on the ground that there was no proof of criminal facts as to the acceptance of bribe and the offering of bribe for Defendant B and each of the offering of bribe for Defendant B, as alleged in the grounds of appeal. In so doing, the lower court did not err by violating the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.