All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A (misunderstanding of the facts) was only the fact that he performed a flabbbbbage in the victim B, and there was no fact that Defendant A had the flabbbbage, or the flabbbbing of flab with the flab.

B. Defendant B (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of the legal principles) Defendant B did not contain any fact that the victim A exceeded the floor.

However, the act of taking the knife of the victim A constitutes a legitimate defense for the defense of the above victim's continuous assault.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by Defendant A, i.e., the victim B appeared as a witness in the court of original instance and led to the attack and pressure of Defendant A by attacking himself/herself, but he/she exceeded his/her own again.

The statement to the effect that “A” was stated, ② Defendant A recognized the fact that at least the victim B’s ebbbage was flick at least in this Court, and the fact that the force can be exercised by itself, ③ Defendant A’s intention in charge was pushed the victim B in this case.

A statement was made and the purport of such statement was stated in the vehicle for medical treatment, and it was also in the police investigation process that the victim B was sealed.

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, (4) The diagnosis of injury to the victim B is stated to the effect that the victim B suffered the injury requiring two weeks of medical treatment, and that it was falsely prepared or it is not deemed that there was any other cause than the defendant's act, etc., the defendant A may recognize the fact that the victim B suffered the injury, such as the facts stated in the facts

Therefore, Defendant A’s assertion is without merit.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, that is, the victim A appeared as a witness in the court of the lower court and the victim B was on his own land.