logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.05.25 2015고정1844
폭행치상
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B found in order to resist on October 23, 2015, on the grounds that at the management office of the sixth floor of the building D in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, the sixth floor of the building D, the Defendant attached a stoper on his/her own vehicle, thereby making a claim against Defendant B, who is the head of the management office, and making a stoper.

1. Defendant A caused the victim’s arms and shoulder at the time and place above for the foregoing reasons, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, thereby causing the victim to inflict bodily injury on the part of the shoulder pipe and the tension, which requires two-day medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1) above, suffered an injury on the part of the Defendant B in need of three weeks of treatment by breaking the victim A with whom he is carrying himself, resulting in the victim’s fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor in which he was fluord with the fluoral fluor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Statement made by the police against Defendant A;

1. The written statement of Defendant A;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Determination of the Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion of the injury diagnosis certificate and the diagnosis certificate

1. Summary of the assertion

A. Defendant B was in the process of spreading the victim A, who was less under his/her own interest, by hand, and did not interfere with the victim.

B. The injury suffered by the victim is the fluoral base, and the victim only visited the emergency room on the day of the instant case, but did not receive any subsequent medical treatment, resulting in the injury.

It is difficult to see it.

(c)

Defendant

B’s act is a legitimate act that is a legitimate defense or legitimate act.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following: ① the victim was a victim of the Defendant B’s arms or shoulder, and the victim was a victim of the Defendant B.

Defendant B consistently made a statement, and ② Defendant B was in excess of the victim in the process of spreading the victim who was less than one’s own timber in his hand.

First, Defendant B’s assertion.

arrow