Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 4 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 2012, around around 2012, he was employed by a company operated by Defendant A and worked as an employee.

Defendant

B enforced enforcement on December 17, 2014 with enforcement officers around 12:40 on December 17, 2014 in order to execute the overdue wages of KRW 6.8 million in around 2012, and enforcement was conducted on the collection of air condition, such as cooling at the office of the above A located in the Dobong-gu Seoul building E-101.

1. Defendant A, at around 13:00 on the same day, had the execution officer completed compulsory execution, but he was about to bring about additional tools, etc. in the victim B (S 49). Defendant A, as his hand, she was flicked with the bomb, and had the said B suffered bodily injury, such as flick dump, etc. for about two weeks during the 2 week border.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and time as in the preceding paragraph, and on the ground that the victim A (50 taxes) carried his flabb, flab, etc., was flabed, and flabed together with the flab, and caused the above Defendant A to suffer bodily injury, such as the frame of the flab, etc. of the flab in the flab during about 10 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A photograph of the victim's Category B damage;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to the victim (Defendant B);

1. Part of Defendant B’s legal statement (the part recognizing the fact that he she satizes A)

1. The diagnosis letter of self-injury A (the defense counsel in Defendant B asserts to the effect that the defendant's flabing of flabage of A constitutes a justifiable act as a reflective act against the flabing agents of A, and that his flabing of flab, even though he was flabed, shall lose center due to speed and go beyond ice flab, and thus, it does not constitute a causal relation between his own act and the injury of A.

However, in opposition to A's act outside the office, B's flabing can be deemed to constitute a crime of assault under the Criminal Act, and B's flabing can be deemed to be a crime of assault under the Criminal Act, and due to the flabing of B's flab, and the flabing of B's flab, and caused injury under B.