Text
1. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed H, I, and J, Defendant B, C, E, F, and G:
(a) for each of 110,000,000 won and its corresponding;
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 21, 201, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) transferred KRW 540,00,000,000 to the head of Tong in the name of the reconstruction association, which is the representative of the said association, respectively.
B. On February 2, 2012, the Plaintiff, the designated parties, and the Defendants B, C, E, F, and G affixed their seals on the following agreements (hereinafter “instant agreement”).
In the agreement, the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office L, which has obtained a new construction permit for real estate subject to the agreement, and reported to sell it as M, the exclusive use area of 30.96 square meters for 105, 15.50 square meters for public use, 6.94 square meters for parking lots area, 53.40 square meters for contract area, 4.45 square meters for land ownership, 4.45 square meters for land ownership (referring to the plaintiff and the designated parties; hereinafter referred to as “A”) and B (referring to the defendant and the P corporation; hereinafter referred to as “B”) agree as follows:
1. Gap and Eul were sectional owners of the Seocho-gu Seoul National University's Ground K stores, and they decided to reconstruct the above K stores, and Gap would sell the real estate in question.
2.B confirms that Party A is obligated to pay Party B 50,000,000 won which it has lent to Party B.
Provided, That the defendant C shall bear the liability of the defendant G out of the total amount of the above-mentioned liability.
3. Eul decided to sell the real estate at KRW 1,200,000 to Gap. However, Gap concluded a sales contract with a trust company of KRW 1,601,878,200 and agreed to pay KRW 401,878,200, which is the difference between Eul and Eul. Eul shall pay KRW 37,34,500, 300,000, excluding the aggregate of the project cost ratio (9.29%) of the plaintiff and the designated parties among KRW 401,878,200, and the additional consultation amount of KRW 64,543,70,000, which is the settlement date of the reconstruction project of this case.
4. The buyer of the above real estate shall be a person designated by Gap.
5. If the purchaser who was designated by A is not the purchaser A, the purchaser shall not raise any civil or criminal objection other than this Agreement.