Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2014, at around 23:25, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property with 100,000 won of 90,000 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession on his own, and 90,000 won of the new bank’s credit card, resident registration certificate, and security card, which are located on the victim’s own, located on the part of the victim.

around 01:25 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant cut off the victim G-owned market price of at least 3 million won, being 3,000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 1665"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure "2014 high-ranking 2609";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include not only the history of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime, but also the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and committed each of the crimes in this case during the suspended sentence period is not that of the crime.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, the damaged goods of the 2014 Godan1665 case shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the motive of the crime of this case, the character, conduct and environment of the defendant, etc.