The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to interference with business in the support of the Sugwon method and Ansan, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 2, 2017.

On March 7, 2017, from around 16:20 to 16:45 on the same day, the Defendant exercised power against the victim D, who is an employee of convenience store, who is engaged in the operation of convenience stores and customers in the convenience store under the influence of alcohol at the convenience store located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and who is an employee of convenience store in the operation of the convenience store, by using force, such as “Aero-ROM, Mag-ro, Mag-ro,” and engaging in a 25-minute bath for 25 minutes without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of one copy of the inquiry letter and the text of the judgment (No. 2017 Height Assistance 860) such as criminal history;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. It shall be so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act (the equity in the case of concurrent judgment with a crime of interference with the duties for which judgment becomes final and conclusive).