Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 to 17:00 on March 8, 2016, the Defendant jointly with B, and obstructed the operation of the office of the victimized person by force for about 5 hours, including where X wears a white straw, and where X goes off “D to cause damage” as in B, the Defendant, who is dissatisfied with the operation of the office of the victimized person, by force, for about 5 hours, such as where the injured person was removed from the office of the said certified judicial scrivener office of the said certified judicial scrivener, and where he was seated to the office of the said office of the said certified judicial scrivener office of the said certified judicial scrivener office of the said certified judicial scrivener office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the statutes of the police statement protocol to H of the police statement protocol on the defendant's legal statement, investigation report (to witness E telephone conversations), investigation report (to witness F telephone conversations) G;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Subsequent to Article 37 of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39(1) (only between occupational embezzlement, perjury, and interference with the business affairs as indicated in the judgment, which became final and conclusive by this Court No. 2017, No. 1552);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act takes account of the fact that the victim does not want to be punished, the obstruction of business affairs in the judgment and the equality with the judgment that became final and conclusive at the same time as the crime of embezzlement and perjury.