logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.06.27 2018고단915
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 3, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor and one year and six months for the obstruction of business in the support for the development of the Suwon method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 20, 2017.

[2018 Godan 915] The Defendant, on December 1, 2016, 11:49 around Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si (hereinafter “Mapo-si”).

[2018 Highest 916] The defendant saw a spons in the vicinity of the patrol box located in the police station located in the Gyeongpo-si on November 25, 2016.

[2018 Height 917] The Defendant, on December 22, 2016, 14:08, Mapo-si bus stops in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si (hereinafter “Mapo-si”).

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 915]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history, inquiry about summary information of cases, and copies of each judgment [2018 Maz. 916];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An explanatory note (2018 Senior 917);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of enforcement manual statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Articles 3(1)20 and 12 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning the crime, the choice of each sentence, and the choice of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exemption Criminal Act (the latter part of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the error, and the fact that the principle of equity is to be taken into account with the case where the decision is to be rendered simultaneously with the obstruction of business in the judgment that became final and conclusive

arrow