logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.02.13 2017고정2148
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CK5 taxis.

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi around 15:10 on May 15, 2017, and continued the crosswalk 3, 48, a 48-lane from the middle-gu Incheon Jung-gu, to the direction of the new interest-based community service center, along the four-lanes from the ethic side of the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic eths., where a signal, etc. is installed

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not stop on the front line of the crosswalk while the vehicle signal is red, and instead did not stop on the front line of the crosswalk, and received the victim D (56) crossing the bicycle from the right side of the direction of the road to the left side of the crosswalk as the front part of the said taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the left-hand slot in need of treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Statement of inspection by this court;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to reply to inquiries into fact, such as a survey report on actual conditions, on-site and vehicle photographs, photofluor photographs, diagnostic records, and images of the vehicles under way;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant and his defense counsel violated the signal, in other words, the vehicle signal, etc. installed in the location of the instant accident (i.e., the Defendant’s right-hand side and the victim’s right-hand side) is red, and the vehicle fit for the signal is not obliged to follow the signal bypassing together with the defendant.

arrow